Leung Chung Ching Edwin and Another v. The Estate of Leung on Mei Amy, Deceased

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 2033/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 July 2014.

1.  In paragraph 8 the first sentence should read "In this context, the application of two presumptions…"; in the fifth sentence delete "But" at the commencement; delete the sixth sentence commencing "Normally…"; in the eighth sentence replace "Where, however," with "But where".

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 2033/2012
Court
High Court CFI
Date30 Jul 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 2033/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 2033 OF 2012

_________________________

  IN THE MATTER OF All those 16
equal undivided 632 nd parts or shares of
THE REMAINING PORTION OF INLAND LOT NO 5161 and THE REMAINING PORTION OF INLAND LOT NO 5162 (known as the 17 th Floor of THYRSE HOUSE, No 16 Pottinger Street, Hong Kong)
  and
  IN THE MATTER OF Sections 45 (e) and (f) and 51 of Trustee Ordinance, Cap 29, Laws of Hong Kong SAR
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Section 25A of the High Court Ordinance, Cap 4 of Laws of Hong Kong SAR
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Order 15 Rule 16 of the Rules of the High Court, Cap 4A, Laws of Hong Kong SAR

_________________________

BETWEEN    
  LEUNG CHUNG CHING EDWIN 1st Plaintiff
  WONG FUNG SAN HANNY 2nd Plaintiff
  and
  The Estate of LEUNG ON MEI AMY, deceased Defendant

_________________________

Before: Hon Zervos J in Court
Date of Hearing: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 17 February and 3 March 2014
Date of Judgment: 30 July 2014
Date of Corrigendum: 6 August 2014

_________________________

CORRIGENDUM
_________________________

1.  In paragraph 8 the first sentence should read "In this context, the application of two presumptions…"; in the fifth sentence delete "But" at the commencement; delete the sixth sentence commencing "Normally…"; in the eighth sentence replace "Where, however," with "But where".

2.  In paragraph 10 after "presumption" insert "of advancement".

3.  In paragraph 17 in the last sentence should read "net proceeds of sale".

4.  In paragraph 63 in the third sentence should read "after which" instead of "afterwards".

5.  In paragraph 63 in the first sentence replace "anger" with "also".

6.  In paragraph 87 the eighth sentence should read "She explained she had adopted what her father said about this in his statement."

7.  In paragraph 91 the first and second sentences should be conjoined with "but".

8.  In paragraph 104 in the second sentence should read "what he did or did not do".

9.  In paragraph 117 in the second sentence "when" replace with "whereas".

10.  In paragraph 130 in the first sentence should read "Amy's funeral".

  Kelvin Chan
  Clerk to The Honourable Mr Justice Zervos