黃曼琪 v. 洪秀錢(黃奕仁之遺產管理人)及另三人
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 21/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 August 2015.
1. The 2 nd defendant appears this morning after judgment has been given by the court. There is no good explanation for his lateness.
Cited by 1 case
|
HCMP 21/2015 香港特別行政區 高等法院原訟法庭 民事司法管轄權 高院雜項案件2015年第21號 ________________________
________________________
________________________
_______________ DECISION 1.The 2nd defendant appears this morning after judgment has been given by the court. There is no good explanation for his lateness. 2.Nevertheless, the 2nd defendant was invited to address the court on what he might have to say about these matters. Essentially, the 2nd defendant repeated what was stated in his affirmation. He accepted that he will have to move out of the Property but asked for time to do so. 3.Having considered the 2nd defendant’s submissions, I see no reason to revisit the judgment.
Mr Patrick SL Wong, instructed by Chiu, Szeto & Cheng, for the plaintiff The 1st defendant appeared in person The 2nd defendant appeared in person The 3rd defendant appeared in person The 4th defendant appeared in person |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 21/2015