BabelCite

Qmy v. Gss

Read the full judgment text of CACV 68/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 18 June 2015.

1. Paragraph 3.12 of the Reasons for Judgment: The word ‘dismissed’ should read as ‘stayed’.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 68/2014
Court
Court of Appeal
Date18 Jun 2015
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 68/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2014

(ON APPEAL FROM FCMP NO. 147 OF 2012)

________________________

  IN THE MATTER OF an Application under Section 10 of the Guardianship of Minors Ordinance, Chapter 13
  and
  IN THE MATTER OF the minor, G

________________________

BETWEEN
QMY Applicant
and
GSS Respondent

________________________

[Guardianship of Minors Ordinance (Cap. 13),
inherent jurisdiction of the Family Court over child
not present in Hong Kong, stay of proceedings]

Before : Hon Lam VP, Cheung and Yuen JJA in Court
Dates of Hearing : 2 December 2014 and 18 June 2015
Date of Judgment : 18 June 2015
Date of Reasons for Judgment : 19 August 2015

____________________

CORRIGENDA

____________________

The following corrections had been made to the Reasons for Judgment dated 19 August 2015:-

1.Paragraph 3.12 of the Reasons for Judgment: The word ‘dismissed’ should read as ‘stayed’.

2.Paragraph 10 of the Reasons for Judgment: The words ‘initially admitted provisionally but eventually’ are to be inserted after the words ‘admission of new evidence which this Court had’ and before the word ‘allowed’.

Date this 30th day of September, 2015

  (Candy Lau)(Ms)
  Clerk to the Hon Cheung JA

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Qmy v. Gss
CACV 68/2014
Court of Appeal28 Apr 2016
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 68/2014

Qmy v. Gss
Court of Appeal18 Jun 2015
Qmy v. Gss
Court of Appeal24 Nov 2015
Qmy v. Gss
Court of Appeal28 Apr 2016