Ngan Yuk Yip By Chan Chiu Shing, Her Next Friend v. Herbal-t (HK) Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCA 1981/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 October 2015.
1. I omitted to deal with the effect upon the plaintiff of the order that the defendant should have its costs of the 1½ days thrown away by the plaintiff’s need to amend the Statement of Claim.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 1981/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 1981 OF 2012 __________________
________________________ ADDENDUM COST 1.I omitted to deal with the effect upon the plaintiff of the order that the defendant should have its costs of the 1½ days thrown away by the plaintiff’s need to amend the Statement of Claim. 2.I had assumed that the plaintiff’s lawyers would acknowledge that this situation had been brought about by their own errors or the errors of counsel or solicitors, probably in this case of the former. 3.For the avoidance of doubt the defendant’s taxed costs should be deducted from the plaintiff’s taxed costs and the plaintiff’s lawyers, either or both must not seek to recovered the consequential shortfall in their own costs, from the plaintiff. In brief, they must forgo those costs as it would be wholly inequitable to expect the plaintiff to pay them. 4.This Addendum will be drawn to the attention of the Taxing Master.
Ms Dora Chan, instructed by Liu, Chan & Lam, for the plaintiff Mr Alan Ng and Ms Kennis Tai, instructed by Pansy Leung Tang & Chua, for the defendant | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1981/2012