It v. Lwyg
Read the full judgment text of FCMC 18087/2013 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 24 September 2015 before Her Honour Judge Sharon D. Melloy.
Family law – Guardianship of Minors Ordinance – Access arrangements – Christmas holiday split – Birthday arrangements – Public holidays – Consent order varied – No order as to costs – High conflict case – Child born June 2010 – Mother and Father – District Court – Matrimonial Causes – Miscellaneous Proceedings – Access to child – School holidays – Public holidays – Birthday – Mother's Day – Father's Day – Consent order – Progress report – Liberty to apply
Legal issues: Christmas/New Year holiday split · Remainder of long school holidays · Birthday arrangements · Single public holidays · Mother's day and Father's day · Amendment to consent order
Outcome: Access arrangements ordered; Consent order varied.
Cites 1 case
|
FCMC 18087/2013 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MATRIMONIAL CAUSES NUMBER 18087 OF 2013 ----------------------------
---------------------------- and FCMP 276/2013 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FAMILY COURT MISCELLANEIOUS PROCEEDINGS NUMBER 276 OF 2013 ----------------------------
----------------------------
---------------------------- (Consolidated by Order of Her Honour Judge Melloy dated 17 July 2014)
----------------------------- RULING ----------------------------- Introduction 1.This is a high conflict case concerning the arrangements for the only child of the family, a little boy, S who was born in June 2010; he is now 5 years of age. 2.The parties asked to be given time to negotiate and on the 9 September they asked for an order to be made in the following terms:
3.As indicated in the consent summons the parties were unable to reach agreement on the following matters:
4.The central issues however were these:
The Mother’s and Father’s case Both parties filed detailed written submissions setting out their case on the all of the outstanding points. I will not repeat those submissions here. Reference should be made to those submissions if deemed necessary. The law in Hong Kong 5.The general principles governing applications relating to children’s issues are set out in s.3 of the Guardianship of Minors Ordinance, Cap 13, which states that:
6.In so far as access is concerned, this is generally said to be the right of the child, as opposed to the parent. In other words the child has the right to see and to have a relationship with both of his parents, even where the circumstances are difficult as here. Discussion How should the Christmas school holiday be split given that the Father’s birthday is on the XX December and that the Mother wishes to enjoy Japanese Chinese New Year with S in Japan from the 31 December – 3 January each year? 7.Each party’s position on this is set out in their written submission. I accept that it would be preferable for S to have the opportunity to spend time with his Father on his birthday, although given the circumstances it will not be possible for that to happen every year. I also accept, as has been agreed in principle, that it is reasonable for the Mother to request that she spend Japanese New Year with S. Likewise the Father wishes to spend Lunar New Year with S. I also agree that both parents should have an opportunity to spend Christmas with S from time to time. With all of this in mind I will make an order as follows:
How should the remainder of the long school holidays be divided? Chinese New Year 8.The parties have agreed in principle that the Father should always be able to enjoy Chinese New Year with S. Thus the Father shall always have access to S from 6:00 pm on Chinese New Year’s eve until 6:00 pm on the 3rd day of Chinese New Year. The remainder of the Chinese New Year school holiday shall be spent with the Mother. Easter 9.The parties have agreed the division of the Easter school holiday in principle, although this is also tied into other arrangements for the child’s birthday and the mid autumn festival. For the avoidance of doubt the child’s Easter school holiday shall be divided equally between the parents. In 2016 the child shall be in the care of the Father for the first half of the Easter school holidays and with the Mother for the second half. This shall be the arrangement in all even years. In odd years beginning in 2017 the child shall be in the care of the Mother for the first half of the Easter school holidays and with the Father for the second half. 10.In 2016 the school holiday commences on the 24 March 2016 and ends on the 4 April 2016. This is a period of 12 days. The child shall be dropped off by the Mother’s domestic helper at the Father’s home at 10 am on the 24 March and the domestic helper shall pick him up at 10 am on the 30 March. In this way each parent shall spend 6 days with S over the Easter school holiday. The summer school holiday 11.The parties have agreed in principle that the school summer holiday shall be split between the parties on a 14 day rotation pro rata basis. The school summer holiday commences on the 9 July 2016. For the avoidance of doubt the summer school holiday runs for 7 ½ weeks. The Father shall have the first two weeks from the 9 – 22 July; the Mother the following two weeks from the 23 – 5 August. There are 26 days left. The Father shall have the next 13 days from the 6 – 18 August and the Mother shall have the last 13 days from the 19 – 31 August. Pick up and drop offs shall be at 10 am on the first day of each part of the rotation. Third parties shall continue to assist with pickups and drop offs. How should S’s birthday and the parent’s birthday’s be dealt with? 12.The Father’s birthday is on the XX December and that has been dealt with as set out in paragraph 7 above. In other words the Father will have an opportunity to spend some time with S on his birthday on an alternate year basis. The Mother’s birthday is on the XX September. The Mother is fairly relaxed about spending time with S on her birthday. Consequently no special provision will be made in this respect. However it should be noted that generally the Mother would expect to spend some time with S on her birthday in any event. This year her birthday is infact today, which is a Thursday and is a normal school day for S. Thursday’s are also the Father’s access day. However the Mother would have had an opportunity to mark her birthday with S before he went to school in the morning. Next year her birthday will be on a Saturday – which means that she will see S when he returns from his weekend access with his Father and can celebrate with him on the following day. 13.S’s birthday is on the XX June. Next year S’s birthday falls on a Sunday. The Father shall spend time with S on his birthday on all even years commencing in 2016 from 10 am – 8:15 pm if it is a weekend and from 4:00 pm – 8:15 pm if it is a school day. The Mother shall spend time with S on his birthday in all odd years. How should the single public holidays be divided? 14.As indicated during the hearing I am of the view that all single public holidays which are not within the longer school holidays or over the weekends should be alternated between the parties. I do not accept that the Father should be entitled to all single public holidays neither do I accept that there should be no special arrangement for these days given that the parties work for the same airline. Consequently the Father shall be entitled to access to S on the following public holidays from 10 am – 8:15 pm: 1 October 2015 2 May 2016 1 July 2016 Single public holidays shall continue to be alternated thereafter. How should Mother’s day and Father’s day be dealt with? 15.I accept that the Father should have an opportunity to spend Father’s day with S over Father’s day weekend. As Father’s day is always on a Sunday, on Father’s day weekend the Father shall have access to S from 4:00 pm on Friday to 8:15 pm on Sunday. Likewise the Mother should have an opportunity to spend the whole weekend with S over Mother’s day weekend and therefore weekend access to the Father shall be suspended on that weekend. Should there be any amendment to the parties consent order referred to above? 16.The consent order should be varied as appropriate to reflect the above. 17.In addition
Mr. S Chan instructed by KC Ho & Fong for the Petitioner Mr. E Chow instructed by Lim & Lok for the Respondent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under FCMC 18087/2013