Read the full judgment text of HCA 115/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. This application was taken out by the plaintiff by summons dated 18 February 2015 for leave to serve a supplemental witness statement of the plaintiff for the trial, which is contested by the 1 st defendant (“the defendant”), not on its admissibility as a supplemental witness statement, but rather on some parts that the defendant complains as inadmissible for the reasons that will be discussed below. [1]
Cites 1 case