Re Tang Chiu Nang
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 3037/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 December 2015.
1. This is an application by ex parte originating summons for a vesting order under section 45 of the Trustee Ordinance Cap 29.
|
HCMP 3037/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 3037 OF 2015 ____________
____________
____________
_________________________ REASONS FOR JUDGMENT _________________________ 1.This is an application by ex parte originating summons for a vesting order under section 45 of the Trustee Ordinance Cap 29. 2.The applicant is the son of Tang Wan Hoi (alias Tang Wing Hoi) (“Father”) who passed away on 7 June 1976 in Hong Kong. The applicant’s mother Chu Yuet Ming (“Mother”) passed away on 16 January 2000. 3.As evident from the land search records, the property known as one equal undivided seventh part or share in Section B of Lot No 3689 in Demarcation District 120 (2nd Floor, 73 Castle Peak Road Yuen Long, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong) (“Property”) was originally purchased by the Father and the Mother on/about 17 January 1959. 4.At the time when the Father passed away, the applicant was not yet of majority age, so his interest in respect of the Father’s half share of the Property (ie half equal undivided seventh part or share in Section B of Lot No 3689 in Demarcation District 120 (“Subject Property”)) was placed in the name of the Mother as trustee for him. By a Succession to Property dated 24 August 1977 registered at the Land Registry, the applicant with the Mother as trustee became the successor of the Subject Property. 5.The Mother passed away without transferring the Subject Property into the applicant’s name. 6.The applicant wishes to deal with the Subject Property. He is seeking a vesting order to the effect that the Mother be removed as trustee in respect of the Subject Property and that the legal estate and interest of and in the Subject Property do vest in him absolutely on the basis that he is sui juris and he is entitled to the Subject Property by virtue of the Succession to Property dated 24 August 1977. 7.I am satisfied in the circumstances that there is no one to be served with the originating summons, and that it would be in order for the application to proceed on ex parte basis.[1] I therefore made the following order as sought in the originating summons at the hearing on 17 December 2015:
Mr Derek Hu, instructed by Liu, Chan & Lam, for the applicant [1] see Re Pacific Good Investment Limited HCMP366/2014, DHCJ Wilson Chan (unreported, 5 March 2014), Re Wu Cheung Chuen HCMP373/2015, DHCJ Paul Lam SC (unreported, 24 March 2015), Re Tang Chau Sang and Tang Ki Wai HCMP3469/2013, L Chan J (unreported, 13 February 2013), Re Yau Wong Yan, Yau Fuk Yan, Yau Fuk Loi and Yau Cho Yan HCMP3338/2013 (unreported, 21 January 2014), and Re Leung Kwai Man alias Leung Man HCMP3193/2014, Chow J (unreported, 11 December 2015) |