HKSAR v. Li Chun Kin

Read the full judgment text of DCCC 689/2015 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.

1. The Defendant pleads guilty to trafficking in methamphetamine hydrochloride or usually known as “Ice” (1 st Charge) and possession of equipment fit and intended for the smoking of it (2 nd Charge).

Cites 2 cases

Case No.DCCC 689/2015
Court
District Court
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCC 689/2015

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 689 OF 2015

-----------------------------------

  HKSAR  
  v  
  LI Chun-kin  
-----------------------------------
Before: HH Judge E. Yip
Date: 18th November 2015 at 10:26 am
Present: Mr Benjamin CHAIN,Counsel on Fiat, for HKSAR
  Mr NG Hoi Lun Alan,instructed by M/s Oliver C.M. Chan & Co assignedby DLA for Defendant
Offence:   [1] Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)
  [2] Possession of equipment fit and intended for the smoking of a dangerous drug (管有適合於及擬用作吸食危險藥物的設備)

----------------------------

Reasons for Sentence

----------------------------

Chargesand facts

1.The Defendant pleads guilty to trafficking in methamphetamine hydrochloride or usually known as “Ice” (1st Charge) and possession of equipment fit and intended for the smoking of it (2nd Charge). 

2.When his cohabitant stepped out from their home in a public housing unit, she was stopped by the police.  By dint of a search warrant, the police searched their home and found the following items, among others:

(1) a plastic bag with contents (later found to be 9.83 grammes of a crystalline solid containing 9.52 grammes of methamphetamine hydrochloride), the subject-matter of the 1st Charge;

(2) a metallic cylinder with one plastic straw and one glass tube, the subject-matter of the 2nd Charge;

(3) a re-sealable plastic bag with powder (later found to have traces of Ice);

(4) an electronic scale;

(5) a bunch of re-sealable plastic bags.

3.In the subsequent interviews under caution, the Defendant said as follows:

(1) he lived there with his cohabitant and their 3-year-old son;

(2) he was a drug addict;

(3) he bought Ice at $1,600 on the evening of 30 May 2015;

(4) the Ice found by the police was the remainder after his consumption;

(5) he would consume it himself and treat his friends to it;

(6) the cylinder, the glass tubes, and the plastic tube were for smoking Ice;

(7) the electronic scale was for weighing the Ice;

(8) the re-sealable plastic bags were for distributing the Ice to others when he treats them;

(9) the powder in the re-sealable plastic bag was traces of Ice.

Defendants’ personal background and mitigation

4.He is 39 years of age, educated up to P. 2 level.  He is on the point of divorce from his wife, who lives in Mainland China and works as a saleslady.  They have a 13-year-old son, taken care of by the Social Welfare Department.  His cohabitant is not working.  At the time of arrest, he earned $13,000 per month as a printing worker. 

5.He had a number of criminal convictions, including 3 for simple possession of dangerous drugs (sentenced in 1996, 1997, and 2012 respectively), and 1 for possession of equipment fit for smoking dangerous drugs (sentenced in 2012).

6.The Ice found in his home could last more than a month.  He had no preset quantity for treating his friends. 

Sentencing considerations

7.As stated in AG v Ching Kwok-hung [1991] 2 HKLR 125, later emended in HKSAR v Capitania [2004] HKCU 926, trafficking of “Ice” of up to 10 g shall warrant 3 – 7 years' imprisonment.

8.The Court of Appeal in HKSAR v Chow Chun-sang[2012] 2 HKLRD 1116 stated that the starting point could be lowered by 10% - 25% where part of the drugs was for self-consumption. 

Sentencing this Defendant

9.I take 6 ½ years as the starting point.  I mark it down to 5 years as the revised starting point in view of his case, which I accept to be true, that an indefinite part of it was for self-consumption. One-third off for the guilty plea, the sentence is 3 years and 4 months for the 1st Charge. 

10.I take 12 months as the starting point for the 2nd Charge. One-third off for the guilty plea, the sentence is 8 months for the 2nd Charge.

11.He has no other mitigating factors.  The sentences shall be concurrent. 

(E. Yip)
District Judge