HKSAR v. Ngie Hon Miu
Read the full judgment text of CACC 263/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 5 February 2016.
1. By our Judgment, dated 11 January 2016, we quashed the appellant’s conviction after trial by the judge and jury of a conspiracy to unlawfully traffick in a dangerous drug and ordered an expedited re-trial.
Cited by 1 case
|
CACC 263/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 263 OF 2012 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 400 OF 2011) ____________
____________
____________________ DECISION ON COSTS ____________________ Hon Lunn VP (giving the Judgment of the Court) : 1.By our Judgment, dated 11 January 2016, we quashed the appellant’s conviction after trial by the judge and jury of a conspiracy to unlawfully traffick in a dangerous drug and ordered an expedited re-trial. 2.In compliance with our directions in respect of the timetable for filing written submissions in support of and in response to an application for costs by the appellant, written submissions were filed by Mr Grounds on behalf of the appellant on 20 January 2016 and in response by Ms Lai on 1 February 2016. 3.Ms Lai does not oppose the application made on behalf of the appellant for an order of costs in his favour for the appeal and the trial in the court below. Conclusion 4.We are satisfied that is the appropriate order and we make an order of costs in favour of the appellant for the appeal and the trial, to be taxed if not agreed. 5.Given that not only have we ordered that there be a re-trial but that the hearing of the re-trial be expedited, we order that, if the parties are unable to agree on the quantum of costs, taxation of costs is to be expedited.
Ms Anna Y K Lai, SADPP, of the Department of Justice, for the respondent Mr Christopher Grounds, instructed by Cheung & Liu, for the appellant |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 263/2012