Case Document

100%Judiciary

CACC 444/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 444 OF 2014

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 98 OF 2013)

____________

BETWEEN

	HKSAR (香港特別行政區)	Respondent
	and
	HUI Rafael Junior also known as HUI Si-yan Rafael (許仕仁)	1^st Appellant/ 1^st Defendant
	KWOK Ping-kwong Thomas (郭炳江)	2^nd Appellant/ 2^nd Defendant
	CHAN Kui-yuen also known as Thomas CHAN (陳鉅源)	3^rd Appellant/ 4^th Defendant
	KWAN Francis Hung-sang also known as KWAN Francis (關雄生)	4^th Appellant/ 5^th Defendant

____________

Before : Hon Yeung, Lunn VPP and Pang JA in Court

Date of Hearing : 2-5 November 2015

Date of Judgment : 16 February 2016

________________________

C O R R I G E N D A
________________________

The following amendments are made to the Judgment dated 16 February 2016:

1. Paragraph 120, line L “even thought he had been working for them unofficially” should read as “even though he had been working for them unofficially” ;

2. Paragraph 244, line R “This ground of appeal has no merit ought not to have been advanced” should read as “This ground of appeal has no merit and ought not to have been advanced”;

3. Page 115, line I “The judge’s ruling admitting into evidence of the out-of-court statement” should read as “The judge’s ruling admitting into evidence the out-of-court statement”;

4. The representation of the 2^nd appellant (D2) should read as “Ms Clare Montgomery, QC, Mr Gary Plowman, SC and Mr Benson Tsoi, instructed by Davis Polk & Wardwell, for the 2^nd appellant (D2)”.

Dated the 22nd day of March 2016.