Qt v. Director of Immigration

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 124/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 March 2016.

1. On page 3, the 3 rd line of paragraph 9, “defendant” should read “dependant” .

Case No.HCAL 124/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Mar 2016
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL124/2014

HE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 124 OF 2014

_______________

BETWEEN    
  QT Applicant
  and  
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Respondent

_______________

Before: Hon Au J in Court
Dates of Hearing: 14 and 15 May 2015
Date of Judgment: 11 March 2016

______________

CORRIGENDUM

______________

Please note the following amendments in the Judgment handed down on 11 March 2016:

1. On page 3, the 3rd line of paragraph 9, “defendant” should read “dependant”.

2. On page 10, the 13th line of paragraph 25, “difference” should read “deference”.

3. On page 12, the 13th line of paragraph 31, “the Director’case” should read “the Director’s case”.

4. On page 14, the 8th line of paragraph 37, “dependant” should read “dependent”.

5. On page 15, the 2nd line of paragraph 39, “with” should read “within”.

6. On page 38, the 4th line of paragraph 85, “homosexual” should read “heterosexual”.

7. On page 40, the 9th line of paragraph 91, “defendant policy” should read “dependant policy”.

8. On page 41, the 7th line of paragraph 95, “…the spousal requirement is thus a proportionate.” should read “…the spousal requirement is thus proportionate.”.

9. On page 42, the 3rd line of paragraph 98, “homosexual” should read “heterosexual”.

Dated the 22nd day of  March 2016

(Abby Wan)(Miss)
Clerk to Hon Au J

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 124/2014