Please note the following amendments in the Judgment handed down on 11 March 2016:
1. On page 3, the 3rd line of paragraph 9, “defendant” should read “dependant”.
2. On page 10, the 13th line of paragraph 25, “difference” should read “deference”.
3. On page 12, the 13th line of paragraph 31, “the Director’case” should read “the Director’s case”.
4. On page 14, the 8th line of paragraph 37, “dependant” should read “dependent”.
5. On page 15, the 2nd line of paragraph 39, “with” should read “within”.
6. On page 38, the 4th line of paragraph 85, “homosexual” should read “heterosexual”.
7. On page 40, the 9th line of paragraph 91, “defendant policy” should read “dependant policy”.
8. On page 41, the 7th line of paragraph 95, “…the spousal requirement is thus a proportionate.” should read “…the spousal requirement is thus proportionate.”.
9. On page 42, the 3rd line of paragraph 98, “homosexual” should read “heterosexual”.