HKSAR v. Lau Shek Leung
Read the full judgment text of CACC 137/2002 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 23 July 2002.
1. The Judge considered this case very carefully. He believed the complainant and disbelieved the applicant. No reasons have been advanced to justify the court in interfering with this conviction.
|
CACC000137/2002 CACC 137/2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 137 OF 2002 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 1082 OF 2001) ______________
______________ Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court Date of Hearing: 23 July 2002 Date of Judgment: 23 July 2002 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1.The Judge considered this case very carefully. He believed the complainant and disbelieved the applicant. No reasons have been advanced to justify the court in interfering with this conviction. 2.The application for leave to appeal against conviction is dismissed.
Representation: Ms Lynda M.A. Shine, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent. Applicant in person. |