Read the full judgment text of FCMC 9935/2007 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 7 April 2016 before Deputy District Judge 陳玉芬.
Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance – Ancillary Relief – Property Division – Post-separation Assets – Concealment of Assets – Needs-based Division – Self-representation – Matrimonial Home – Asset Disclosure – Wife purchased properties after separation using business profits – Court found half of post-separation assets were joint – Husband failed to disclose assets and income – Court drew adverse inference – Wife's health and needs justified deviation from equal division – Wife retains majority of assets including residential properties – Husband receives matrimonial home and court funds
Legal issues: Nature of post-separation assets · Concealment of assets · Deviation from equal division
Outcome: Ancillary relief granted; property division ordered; Wife retains 66% of assets, Husband 34%