Read the full judgment text of CACC 83/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 July 2016.
1. Following his pleas of guilty before HH Judge Douglas Yau (“the judge”) in the District Court on 26 January 2016, the applicant was convicted of two charges of burglary, contrary to section 11(1)(b) and (4) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 (Charges 3 and 4). Upon the applicant’s admission of the amended Summary of Facts and conviction on Charges 3 and 4, the prosecution applied to have Charges 1 and 2 [1] remain on the file, not to be proceeded with without the leave of court. On 9 March 2016,
Cited by 5 cases · Cites 4 cases