Read the full judgment text of DCCC 437/2016 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Defendant faced two charges on the indictment – charge 1 being attempted robbery, contrary to Section 10 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210, and in the alternative, charge 2, being criminal intimidation, contrary to Sections 24(c) (i) and 27 of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200.