Kumara Debanama v. Lui Pui Wai and Another
Read the full judgment text of DCPI 1041/2013 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 29 July 2016.
1. Paragraph 3(1) at p.2T-U, “application for refugee status” should read “application for non-refoulement”.
Cites 1 case
|
DCPI 1041/2013 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 1041 OF 2013 --------------------
--------------------
________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following amendments in the Judgment handed down on 29.7.2016: 1.Paragraph 3(1) at p.2T-U, “application for refugee status” should read “application for non-refoulement”. 2.Paragraph 22 at p.11T-U and p.12G, “...adjourning...” should read “...adjoining...”. 3.Paragraph 47 at p.23E, “...the calls...” should read “...the class...”. 4.Paragraph 47 at p.23E-F, “statures” should read “statutes”. 5.Paragraph 62 at p.28G-H, “...asylum seeker...” should read “...torture claimant...”. 6.Paragraph 64 at p.29C, “...solider” should read “...soldier”. 7.Paragraph 68 at p.29T-U, “...started seeking for refugee status...” should read “...started seeking for protection under the CAT...”. 8.Paragraph 68 at p.30B, “...refugee status...” should read “...granted protection under the CAT...”. Dated the 19th day of August 2016
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under DCPI 1041/2013