HKSAR v. Zhang Ying
Read the full judgment text of HCCC 336/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 December 2015.
|
HCCC 336/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CRIMINAL CASE NO 336 OF 2015 -----------------
------------------
--------------------------------- Transcript of the Audio Recording --------------------------------- COURT: The Defendant, originally charged with one charge of trafficking and one charge theft, pleaded not guilty to the 1st charge but entered a plea to the lesser charge of possession. She pleaded guilty to theft. The plea to a lesser charge of possession of dangerous drugs was accepted by the prosecution. Facts revealed that police officers laying ambush spotted the defendant acting furtively inside a taxi. She was intercepted for a search, and inside the inner zipped pocket of her handbag was one tissue paper wrapping a transparent resealable bag of drugs and a red packet containing two packets of drugs. Under caution, she denied the drug belonged to her. A home visit permit belonging to another person was also found inside the handbag. The defendant said that she picked it up earlier at an amusement game establishment. Under further caution, she maintained a lack of knowledge of the drugs whilst admitting herself to be a drug addict of ‘Ice’. She claimed she has ceased abusing it in April 2014. The present offence happened in February 2015. Upon analysis, the drugs were found to be 12.5 grammes of a crystalline solid containing 12 grammes of ‘Ice’ and 1.85 grammes of a power containing 0.7 grammes of ketamine. The street value of the ‘Ice’ and ketamine was estimated to be at HK$5,400 and HK$222 respectively. The defendant is aged 34. She has a clear record. According to the DATC report, she abused the drugs due to disharmony between her and her mother-in-law who suffered from depression. She abstained from the vice habit during her child-bearing months but relapsed back into such later. Her husband, now on comprehensive social assistance, is solely responsible for taking care of her two sons for the time being. The medical officer is of the opinion that the defendant is a drug dependent and recommended her to undergo drug addiction treatment. Whilst Miss Lee has tried to persuade me to look at the option of an immediate custodial sentence, I do not doubt the observation of the medical officer that this defendant is still not completely drug free. Further, a DATC order has the advantage of an aftercare supervision and recall in cases of breach. I adopt the views of the report and sentence her to DATC on both counts concurrently. |