Read the full judgment text of FCMP 283/2011 on BabelCite. This FCMP judgment.
1. By an inter-parte summons dated 9 th March 2016 (hereinafter called “the mother’s summons”), the Respondent mother (hereinafter called “the mother”) made the Application to vary the Consent Order dated 9 th May 2013(“the Consent Order”). The issue of the mother’s summons before me is that the undertakings provided by the mother under Recitals D, H, and K of the Consent Order be varied, and the Applicant father (hereinafter called “the father “) opposed to the mother’s application.
Cites 1 case