Imran Muhammad and Another v. Secretary for Security and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 227/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 October 2016.
Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 227/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 227 OF 2015 _______________
_______________
____________________ CORRIGENDUM ____________________ In the 4th line of paragraph 26(1), “significant change to the family circumstances...” should read “no significant change to the family circumstances...” In the 1st line of paragraph 32(1), “The fact of the 1st applicant torture claim...” should read “The fact of the 1st applicant’s torture claim...” In the 1st line of paragraph 33(2), “Further, an in any event...” should read “Further, an and in any event...” In the 4th line of paragraph 34, “to decide whether nor the DO...” should read “to decide whether nor the DO...” In the 7th line of paragraph 57, “...Director’s letter...” should read “...the Director’s letter...” In the 10th line of paragraph 57, “...and Secretary’s letter dated...” should read “...and the Secretary’s letter dated...” In the 13th line of paragraph 57, “...application for leave to judicial review...” should read “...application for leave to apply for judicial review...”
Dated the 19th day of October 2016. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 227/2015