Gainfield Investment Ltd and Others v. Legend Time Ltd and Others
Read the full judgment text of LDCS 16000/2014 on BabelCite. This LDCS judgment was delivered on 17 October 2016.
1. On page 50, paragraph 141, the EUV of Garages 2A & 2B should be “$58,940,000” and the total EUV should be “$532,210,000”;
Cites 1 case
|
LDCS 16000/2014 IN THE LANDS TRIBUNAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION LAND COMPULSORY SALE MAIN APPLICATION NO. LDCS 16000 OF 2014 __________________
__________________
__________________ CORRIGENDUM __________________ 1.On page 50, paragraph 141, the EUV of Garages 2A & 2B should be “$58,940,000” and the total EUV should be “$532,210,000”; 2.On page 51, paragraph 142, the pro rata of Total EUV of R1, R2, R3 and R6 should be 1.6685%, 1.9165%, 1.7286% and 2.2679% respectively; 3.On page 75, paragraph 210, the amount $944,000,000 should be $941,000,000. 4.On page 76, paragraph 210, $113,500/sq m should be $113,140/sq m. 5.On page 78, paragraph 217, the RDV as determined by the Tribunal at Appendix 3 should be $941,000,000; Apportioned RDV attributable to R1 should be:
Apportioned RDV attributable to R2 should be:
(which is higher than the latest offer by 7.46%) Apportioned RDV attributable to R3:
(which is lower than the latest offer by 2.51%) 6.On page 90, paragraph 252, sub-paragraph (3), the reserve price should be $941,000,000; 7.Appendix 1, the amount of Garages should be “$58,940,000” and the Total EUV should be “$532,210,000”; 8.Appendix 3 be amended as Bold and Italic as follow:-
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under LDCS 16000/2014