Li Lai Ying v. Top Fortune Finance Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCCW 415/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 24 January 2017.
1. I have before me a summons issued by the Company for a validation order. The Company is a licensed money lender. The Petitioner, who is not legally represented, has issued a petition for return of HK$200,000 which it would appear from the evidence that has been filed to date relates to a deposit paid in respect of the sale of landed property.
|
HCCW 415/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO 415 OF 2016 _________________
_________________
________________________ D E C I S I O N ________________________ 1.I have before me a summons issued by the Company for a validation order. The Company is a licensed money lender. The Petitioner, who is not legally represented, has issued a petition for return of HK$200,000 which it would appear from the evidence that has been filed to date relates to a deposit paid in respect of the sale of landed property. 2.The Petitioner did not appear today. She sent a friend Ms To Shuk Yee Suki to represent her. As I explained to Ms To this she was not able to do. However, having asked her a number of questions, it appears unclear whether the Petitioner understands the precise nature of the application that I am dealing with today. 3.I am satisfied, having read the evidence and having regard to what I consider to be reasons to think that the petition was not the right process for the Petitioner to use to try and recover the sums that she believes she is owed, that a validation order should be granted. I will make an order in the following terms:
The petitioner was not represented and did not appear Mr Roland Lau, instructed by Mak Solicitors, for the respondent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||