Wong Wing Yue Rosaline v. Next Media Interactive Ltd and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2701/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 February 2017.
1. Page 2, paragraph 3 and line L, “… the Inirnging Photos …” should read as “…the Infringing Photos …”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 2701/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 2701 OF 2016 _________
_________
________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________ Please note that the following corrections in the Decision handed down by Deputy High Court Judge Kent Yee on 21 February 2017: 1. Page 2, paragraph 3 and line L, “… the Inirnging Photos …” should read as “…the Infringing Photos …”. 2. Page 4, paragraph 10 and line D, “… paragraph 1(a)(e) …” should read as “…paragraph 1(e) …”. 3. Page 4, paragraph 11 and lines G and L, “… paragraph 1(a)(e) …” should read as “…paragraph 1(e) …” and line H, “… the plaintiff applied to have the application be heard …” should read as “… the plaintiff applied to have the application heard …”. 4. Page 13, paragraph 34 and line J, “However, neither individual rights …” should read as “Neither individual rights…”. 5. Page 15, paragraph 41 and line J, “I agree with Mr Lau …” should read as “I agree with Ms Lau …”. 6. Page 15, paragraph 42 and line O, “… paragraph 1(a)(e) …” should read as “…paragraph 1(e) …”. 7. Page 16, line L, “Raymond K.S. Chan & Co.” should read as “Peter K.S. Chan & Co.”. Dated this 22nd day of February 2017.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2701/2016