HKSAR v. Jareen

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 690/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 February 2017.

1. The Appellant pleaded guilty in the Magistrates’ Court to a charge of stealing a bicycle, which she was caught in the act of taking away, and of possession of dangerous drugs, namely 0.03 grammes of a crystalline solid containing methamphetamine hydrochloride, commonly known as “Ice”, those drugs being found in a bag which she was carrying at the time of her arrest for stealing the bicycle.

Case No.HCMA 690/2016
Court
High Court CFI
Date03 Feb 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA 690/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO 690 OF 2016

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 3570/2016)

______________________

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
and
JAREEN Appellant

______________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge V Bokhary in Court
Date of Hearing: 3 February 2017
Date of Judgment: 3 February 2017

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________


1.The Appellant pleaded guilty in the Magistrates’ Court to a charge of stealing a bicycle, which she was caught in the act of taking away, and of possession of dangerous drugs, namely 0.03 grammes of a crystalline solid containing methamphetamine hydrochloride, commonly known as “Ice”, those drugs being found in a bag which she was carrying at the time of her arrest for stealing the bicycle.

2.She was sentenced to a total of 6 months’ imprisonment by way of concurrent terms of 6 weeks’ imprisonment for the theft, and of 6 months’ imprisonment for possession of dangerous drugs. 

3.She is a drug dependent, but is unsuitable for admission to a Drug Addiction Treatment Centre because her immigration status in Hong Kong renders the statutory one-year supervision impractical.

4.She appeals against sentence, saying that 6 months’ imprisonment is too long for the small quantity of “Ice” which she had in her possession for self-use. 

5.Her background is a sad one.  However, while I have sympathy for her plight, I do not find any basis for saying that the Magistrate passed a sentence which is beyond the appropriate range or which fails to take duly into account any mitigation available to the Appellant. 

6.The appeal must be dismissed, and I dismiss it. 

  (V Bokhary)
Deputy Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Ms Jasmine Ching, SPP of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

The Appellant appeared in person