Read the full judgment text of CACV 63/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 15 March 2017.
1. I respectfully agree with the judgment of Kwan JA and for the reasons given by Her Ladyship the appeal is dismissed with costs. A major plank of the submissions of Mr Chan (counsel for the 4 th Respondent) was that as the deceased acted in the course of employment at the time of murder by providing services to the 1 st Respondent, this would point to him being an employee of the 1 st Respondent at the material time.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 3 cases