Nam Sang Wai Development Co Ltd and Another v. Town Planning Board

Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 16 February 2017.

1.  At page 30, footnote 66 at 4 th line, the phrase “omits merit” should be replaced by “on its merit”.

Case No.
Court
Date16 Feb 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FACV No. 8 of 2016

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2016 (CIVIL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 25 OF 2014)

_____________________

BETWEEN

  TOWN PLANNING BOARD Applicant (Respondent)
  and
  TOWN PLANNING APPEAL BOARD Respondent
  NAM SANG WAI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED and KLEENERINVESTMENT LIMITED Interested Parties
(Appellants)

_____________________

Before : Chief Justice Ma, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ,Mr Justice Tang PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Lord Millett NPJ

Date of Hearing: 5 January 2017

Date of Judgment : 16 February 2017

Date of Corrigendum: 6 April 2017

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________

1.  At page 30, footnote 66 at 4th line, the phrase “omits merit” should be replaced by “on its merit”.

 

(Ingrid Lam) (Ms)
  for Registrar, CFA

Nam Sang Wai Development Co Ltd and Another v. Town Planning Board [] | BabelCite