Li Ping Chun, The Co-administratrix of the Estate of Leung Foo Su (or She), The Deceased and Another v. Liang Tonghua
Read the full judgment text of CACV 220/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 5 May 2017.
1. The appeal by the defendant is scheduled to be heard on 10 May 2017. The date was fixed on 8 December 2016 with the parties’ agreement. On 11 April 2017, the Court received a Notice of Application for Legal Aid dated 10 April 2017 by the defendant. The plaintiffs by summons dated 26 April 2017 requested the lifting of the stay of proceedings by reason of the defendant’s legal aid application.
Cites 1 case
|
CACV 220/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2016 (ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 745 OF 2011) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________
________________________ D E C I S I O N ________________________ Hon Cheung JA (giving the Decision of the Court) : 1.The appeal by the defendant is scheduled to be heard on 10 May 2017. The date was fixed on 8 December 2016 with the parties’ agreement. On 11 April 2017, the Court received a Notice of Application for Legal Aid dated 10 April 2017 by the defendant. The plaintiffs by summons dated 26 April 2017 requested the lifting of the stay of proceedings by reason of the defendant’s legal aid application. 2.The defendant had filed a submission in response to the summons and she requested an adjournment of the appeal. We will deal with the application on paper. 3.The defendant was until recently legally represented. Had she really wanted legal aid to represent her, she ought to have made the application earlier. We agree with the plaintiffs that this is a last minute application by the defendant and an attempt by her to postpone the hearing of the appeal. From the evidence produced by the plaintiffs, the defendant is the owner of two mortgage free properties and may not even qualify for legal aid on means grounds. We will not grant the adjournment and will lift the stay. The appeal will proceed as scheduled. 4.Costs of the application be to the plaintiffs.
The defendant acting in person Tai, Tang and Chong, solicitors for the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 220/2016