HKSAR v. Tsang Sin Yi

Read the full judgment text of CACC 233/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 January 2017.

1. The judges’s approach may arguably be incorrect. The case should be examined by the Court of Appeal. Leave of appeal against sentence is granted.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACC 233/2016
Court
Court of Appeal
Date17 Jan 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 233/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 233 OF 2016

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 100 OF 2014)

_______________________

BETWEEN    
HKSAR Respondent
and
TSANG SIN YI (曾倩怡) Applicant

_______________________

Before: Hon Yeung VP in Court
Date of Judgment: 17 January 2017

____________________

J U D G M E N T

____________________

1.The judges’s approach may arguably be incorrect. The case should be examined by the Court of Appeal. Leave of appeal against sentence is granted.

  (Wally Yeung)
  Vice-President

Written submission by Mr Prakash L Daryanani, SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the respondent

The applicant appeared in person

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 233/2016