Mr Mizanur Rahm v. Ms Mary Yuen, Esq.
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 2/2017 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 May 2017.
1. The Applicant has failed to appear this morning to prosecute his leave application.
|
HCAL 2/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 2 OF 2017 ___________________________
___________________________ Before: Hon Anthony Chan J in Court Date of Hearing: 25 May 2017 Date of Decision: 25 May 2017 _______________ D E C I S I O N _______________ 1.The Applicant has failed to appear this morning to prosecute his leave application. 2.In any event, I am unable to find any merit in this application. The Applicant was found to be an unreliable witness by the Appeal Board, and the Board was not satisfied that any of his 3 claims (risk of torture, risk of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and risk of persecution) had been made out. I see no reasonably arguable challenge to the decision of the Appeal Board. 3.I therefore dismiss this application.
The Applicant was not represented and did not appear | ||||||||||||||||||||