|
FACC Nos. 11 & 18 of 2016
FACC No. 11 of 2016
IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
FINAL APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2016 (CRIMINAL)
(ON APPEAL FROM CACC NOS. 103 OF 2012 AND 183 OF 2014)
_______________________
BETWEEN
| |
SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE |
Respondent |
| |
and |
|
| |
CHAN CHI WAN STEPHEN (陳志雲) (D1) |
Appellant |
_______________________
FACC No. 18 of 2016
IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
FINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2016 (CRIMINAL)
(ON APPEAL FROM CACC NOS. 103 OF 2012 AND 183 OF 2014)
_______________________
BETWEEN
| |
SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE
|
Respondent
|
| |
and |
|
| |
TSENG PEI KUN (叢培崑) (D2) |
Appellant |
_______________________
| Before : Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ,
Mr Justice Fok PJ, Mr Justice Stock NPJ and
Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe NPJ |
| Date of Judgment: 19 May 2017 |
| Date of Corrigendum: 28 June 2017 |
__________________________
CORRIGENDUM
__________________________
Please note the following amendments in the Judgment on Costs dated 19 May 2017:
In paragraph 8:
(a) Replace “Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance (Cap 492)” with “Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap 221)”
(b) Replace “provides” with “provided”
In paragraph 9:
(a) Replace “concerns” with “concerned”
(b) Insert at the end of the first sentence: “That section has since been repealed by the Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance (Cap 492) which (in sections 3 to 9B) makes detailed provision for the award of costs to the defence in specified sets of court proceedings.”
(c) Replace the last sentence with the following: “As with the repealed section 73A, we do not consider that costs incidental to an arrest come within any of the aforesaid provisions of Cap 492.”
| |
(Ms. M.Y. LAM)
for Registrar, CFA |
|