Secretary for Justice v. Chan Chi Wan Stephen

FACC Nos. 11 & 18 of 2016

FACC No. 11 of 2016

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2016 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACC NOS. 103 OF 2012 AND 183 OF 2014)

_______________________

BETWEEN

_______________________

FACC No. 18 of 2016

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2016 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACC NOS. 103 OF 2012 AND 183 OF 2014)

_______________________

BETWEEN

_______________________

__________________________

CORRIGENDUM

__________________________

Please note the following amendments in the Judgment on Costs dated 19 May 2017:

In paragraph 8:

(a) Replace “Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance (Cap 492)” with “Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap 221)”

(b) Replace “provides” with “provided”

In paragraph 9:

(a) Replace “concerns” with “concerned”

(b) Insert at the end of the first sentence: “That section has since been repealed by the Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance (Cap 492) which (in sections 3 to 9B) makes detailed provision for the award of costs to the defence in specified sets of court proceedings.”

(c) Replace the last sentence with the following: “As with the repealed section 73A, we do not consider that costs incidental to an arrest come within any of the aforesaid provisions of Cap 492.”