|
CACC 385/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 385 OF 2015
(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 501 OF 2015)
------------------------
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
HKSAR |
Respondent |
| |
and |
|
| |
GURUNG LAXMAN (古龍力文) |
Appellant |
------------------------
| Before: Hon Yeung Ag CJHC, McWalters JA and Pang JA in Court |
| Date of Hearing: 4 January 2017 |
| Date of Judgment: 16 May 2017 |
__________________________
CORRIGENDUM
__________________________
The paragraph 49 on page 15 Line I,
“This device was developed by the Court of Appeal in drug trafficking cases to deal with the situation where a drug trafficker claimed, and the sentencing judge accepted, that a significant portion of the drugs were possessed for the drug trafficker’s own consumption and this may well make a difference to sentence.”
should read
“This device was developed by the Court of Appeal in drug trafficking cases to deal with the situation where a drug trafficker claimed, and the sentencing judge accepted, that a significant proportion of the drugs were possessed for the drug trafficker’s own consumption and this may well make a difference to sentence.”
The paragraph 54 on page 17 Line E,
“Where the claim to self-consumption is made in respect of an unquantifiable amount which is accepted as being a significant portion of the whole then the principles laid down in HKSAR v Wong Suet Hau & Anor and HKSAR v Chow Chun Sang will apply.”
should read
“Where the claim to self-consumption is made in respect of an unquantifiable amount which is accepted as being a significant proportion of the whole then the principles laid down in HKSAR v Wong Suet Hau & Anor and HKSAR v Chow Chun Sang will apply.”
Dated this 19th day of July, 2017.
| |
(Danny Tse) |
| |
Clerk to Hon McWalters JA |
|