Israel Sorin (Izzy) Shohat v. Balram Chainrai

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 9/2016 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 21 July 2017 before Hon Chow J in Chambers.

Arbitration — Enforcement of Arbitration Award — Costs — Procedural adherence under Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) s.87 and Rules of the High Court Cap. 4A Order 73, rule 10(1) — This case concerns the enforcement proceedings for an arbitration award dated 31 October 2013 and the award on costs in relation thereto. The court considers procedural requirements under section 87 of the Arbitration Ordinance and relevant rules for enforcement and cost awards. Counsel for the award debtor was correctly named following a corrigendum. The outcome and consequential orders were not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 9/2016
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date21 Jul 2017
JudgeHon Chow J in Chambers
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 9/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS NO 9 OF 2016

_______________

  IN THE MATTER of the Enforcement of the Arbitration Award and an Arbitration Award on Costs both made on 31 October 2013 (“the Award”)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Section 87 of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Order 73, rule 10(1) of the Rules of the High Court Cap. 4A

_______________

BETWEEN
  ISRAEL SORIN (IZZY) SHOHAT Applicant
(Award Creditor)
and
  BALRAM CHAINRAI Respondent
(Award Debtor)

_______________

Before: Hon Chow J in Chambers (Open to Public)
Date of Hearing: 21 July 2017
Date of Decision: 21 July 2017
Date of Corrigendum: 24 July 2017

______________

CORRIGENDUM

______________

Please note the following corrigendum in the decision dated 21 July 2017:

The name of the counsel for the award debtor should read as “Mr Albert Yau and Miss Man Yin Ting” as appear at page 7, last line of the decision, at line D.

  (Clara NG)
Clerk to the Hon Chow, J.