Read the full judgment text of CACV 244/1998 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 11 February 2000.
1. In this action, the Defendant applied for a stay of the proceedings. It did so on two grounds. The first was that an exclusive jurisdiction clause required the dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to be determined in the courts of the mainland. The second was that the Guangzhou Maritime Court in the Province of Guangdong was the more appropriate forum for the resolution of the dispute than the High Court of Hong Kong. Stone J declined to stay the proceedings, and the Defendant now
Cited by 1 case