Chu Kwok Kee Kookie the Committee of the Estate of Ming Chor Pao, A Mentally Incapaciatated Person v. Chu Kwok Bing and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2728/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 April 2017.

1. This action was commenced by the plaintiff, Mr Chu Kwok-kee Kookie as the committee and on behalf of Madam Ming Chor-pao.

Cited by 3 cases

Case No.HCA 2728/2015
Court
High Court CFI
Date26 Apr 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 2728/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 2728 OF 2015

______________________

BETWEEN
  CHU KWOK KEE KOOKIE the committee of the estate of Ming Chor Pao, a mentally incapaciatated person (pursuant to the order of High Court Judge L Chan made on 18 June 2015 under Part II of the Mental Health Ordinance, Cap 136) Plaintiff
  and
  CHU KWOK BING
1st Defendant
  CHU KWOK MUI also known as CHU KWOK MUI CAMAY 2nd Defendant

______________________

Before: Hon Wilson Chan J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 26 April 2017
Date of Decision: 26 April 2017

______________________

D E C I S I O N

______________________

1.This action was commenced by the plaintiff, Mr Chu Kwok-kee Kookie as the committee and on behalf of Madam Ming Chor-pao.

2.It is not disputed that Madam Ming died in November 2016.  Pursuant to section 27(4) of the Mental Health Ordinance, Cap 136, the committee of the estate of Madam Ming was discharged (without any order) on the death of Madam Ming. 

3.However, this does not mean that the cause of action itself did not survive the death of Madam Ming.  Order 15, rule 7 of the Rules of the High Court permits any person in whom the cause of action vests to apply for a substitution order, substituting himself or herself as the plaintiff. 

4.However, the application for a substitution order should be made promptly.  Order 15, rule 9(1) of the Rules of the High Court provides inter alia that:

“If after the death of a plaintiff...in any action the cause of action survives, but no order under rule 7 is made substituting the plaintiff any person in whom the cause of action vests..., the defendant...may apply to the Court for an order that unless the action is proceeded with within such time as may be specified in the order the action shall be struck out as against the plaintiff...who has died.”

5.In my view, the terms of Order 15, rule 9(1) clearly envisage that a reasonable time should be given to the person intending to apply for a substituation order before the action is struck out.

6.Accordingly, in the present case, I order that:

(i) Unless the action is proceeded with within three months from the date hereof, the action shall be struck out as against the plaintiff.

As the order granted is conditional in nature, I order that:

(ii) Costs be reserved.

  (Wilson Chan)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr C K Wong, of Charles Yeung, Clement Lam, Liu & Yip, for the plaintiff

The 1st defendant appeared in person

The 2nd defendant was not represented and did not appear