Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCA 1062/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 1062 OF 2012

____________

BETWEEN
	CHINACAST EDUCATION CORPORATION	1st Plaintiff
	CHINACAST TECHNOLOGY (BVI) LIMITED	2nd Plaintiff
	CHINACAST TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) LIMITED	3rd Plaintiff
	雙巍資訊技術(上海)有限公司
	YUPEI TRAINING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	4th Plaintiff
	語培信息科技(上海)有限公司
	CHINACAST (BEIJING) EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED	5th Plaintiff
	盛世漢洋(北京)教育科技有限公司
AND
	CHAN TZE NGON (陳子昂)	1st Defendant
	ANTONIA SENA	2nd Defendant
	MA JIM LOK JIM(馬詹諾)	3rd Defendant
	JIANG XIANGYUAN (江祥源)	4th Defendant
	FU WAI FAN (傅慧芬)	5th Defendant
	WONG DORA WING MAY(黃詠薇)	6th Defendant
	KWOK SHUK YIN(郭淑賢)	7th Defendant
	CHIN SWE DEE	8th Defendant
	THRIVING BLUE LIMITED	9th Defendant
	BEST DESTINY LIMITED	10th Defendant
	ISTHOCH ASSETS LIMITED	11th Defendant
	CAST GREAT LIMITED	12th Defendant
	NEW SHANGHAI INVESTMENTS LIMITED	13th Defendant

____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Kent Yee in Court

Dates of Hearing: 15-19, 22-26, 29 August & 12 September 2016
Dates of Written Submissions:	20 October 2016 (the 3^rd defendant)
	1 November 2016 (the plaintiffs)
Date of Judgment: 31 July 2017

___________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

___________________

Please note that the following corrections in the Judgment handed down by Deputy High Court Judge Kent Yee on 31 July 2017:

1.Page 4, paragraph 7 and line M to N, “...Mr Ma claims damages for his loss and damage arising from a Mareva injunction granted by A. Chan J against him upon the application of the Group (“the Mareva Injunction”)” should read as “...Mr Ma claims damages for his loss and damage arising from a Mareva injunction granted by Tong J and further continued by A. Chan J against him upon the application of the Group (“the Mareva Injunction”)”.

Dated this 1^st day of September 2017.