Qt v. Director of Immigration

Read the full judgment text of CACV 117/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 25 September 2017.

1. At line D to E of Page 49 (Paragraph 110), “…And the burden is always on the government to satisfy that the justification test is met…” should read “…And the burden is always on the government to satisfy the Court that the justification test is met…”;

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 117/2016
Court
Court of Appeal
Date25 Sep 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 117/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 117 OF 2016

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO 124 OF 2014)

_______________

BETWEEN
  QT Applicant
  (Appellant)
and
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Respondent
  (Respondent)

_______________

Before: Hon Cheung CJHC, Lam VP and Poon JA in Court
Dates of Hearing: 15 and 16 June 2017
Date of Judgment: 25 September 2017
Date of Corrigendum: 24 October 2017

______________

Corrigendum

______________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 25 September 2017:-

1.At line D to E of Page 49 (Paragraph 110), “…And the burden is always on the government to satisfy that the justification test is met…” should read “…And the burden is always on the government to satisfy the Court that the justification test is met…”;

2.At line C of Page 53 (Paragraph 115), “...the Policy is not unsubstantial” should read “…the Policy is not insubstantial”;

3.At line N of Page 56 (Paragraph 124), “…interdependency is part and partial of…” should read “…interdependency is part and parcel of…”; and

4.At line D to E of Page 67 (Paragraph 148), “…the Director has failed to satisfy that the Eligibility Requirement is rationally connected to …” should read “…the Director has failed to satisfy the Court that the Eligibility Requirement is rationally connected to…”.


Dated this 24th day of October 2017

  (Marco SO)
  for Registrar, High Court