BabelCite

Cheung Chi Wah Patrick v. Hong Kong Cement Co Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCLA 18/2016 on BabelCite. This HCLA judgment was delivered on 8 September 2017.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCLA 18/2016
Court
HCLA
Date08 Sep 2017
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCLA 18/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

LABOUR TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2016

(ON APPEAL FROM LBTC 3049 OF 2015)

____________

BETWEEN
  CHEUNG CHI WAH PATRICK (張志華) Claimant
  (Respondent)
and
  HONG KONG CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED Defendant
(Appellant)

____________

Before: Hon L Chan J in Court
Date of Hearing: 29 August 2017
Date of Decision: 8 September 2017

_________________

CORRIGENDUM

_________________

Page 17, Paragraph 33 Lines I to K:

“Hence, I do not think it necessary to consider this finding as a substation for the Impugned Finding.” should be changed to “Hence, I do not think it necessary to consider this finding as a substitution for the Impugned Finding.”

  (Edmond WONG)
  Clerk to Hon L. Chan J


Dated the 1st day of December 2017

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Cheung Chi Wah Patrick v. Hong Kong Cement Co Ltd
HCLA 18/2016
HCLA08 Sep 2017
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCLA 18/2016

Cheung Chi Wah Patrick v. Hong Kong Cement Co Ltd
HCLA08 Sep 2017
Cheung Chi Wah Patrick v. Hong Kong Cement Co Ltd
HCLA08 Sep 2017