Cheung Chi Wah Patrick v. Hong Kong Cement Co Ltd

HCLA 18/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

LABOUR TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2016

(ON APPEAL FROM LBTC 3049 OF 2015)

____________

____________

_________________

CORRIGENDUM

_________________

Page 17, Paragraph 33 Lines I to K:

“Hence, I do not think it necessary to consider this finding as a substation for the Impugned Finding.” should be changed to “Hence, I do not think it necessary to consider this finding as a substitution for the Impugned Finding.”

Dated the 1^st day of December 2017