China Citic Bank International Ltd v. Durrant Simon Patrick Michael
Read the full judgment text of CACV 127/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 December 2017.
1. On 24 November 2017, we handed down our judgment dismissing the three summonses of the defendant, with an order nisi that he should pay the plaintiff’s costs of each summons. We directed the plaintiff’s solicitors to submit a statement of costs for summary assessment with leave to the defendant to respond to that statement within seven days thereafter.
Cites 1 case
|
CACV 127/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2014 (ON APPEAL FROM HCMP NO. 3196 OF 2013) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________ Before: Hon Cheung JA, Kwan JA and Harris J Date of Decision on Costs: 22 December 2017 ________________________ DECISION ON COSTS ________________________ Hon Kwan JA (giving the Decision on Costs of the Court): 1.On 24 November 2017, we handed down our judgment dismissing the three summonses of the defendant, with an order nisi that he should pay the plaintiff’s costs of each summons. We directed the plaintiff’s solicitors to submit a statement of costs for summary assessment with leave to the defendant to respond to that statement within seven days thereafter. 2.The plaintiff’s solicitors submitted their statement of costs on 30 November 2017 in the sum of $38,000. The defendant lodged his objections to that statement by an undated document received by the court on 14 December 2017. He is out of time by one week. 3.We are not obliged to take into account his late objections but have nevertheless considered his representations. 4.The defendant contended that the plaintiff’s reasonable costs should be reduced to $5,367. 5.We reduce the time spent by the plaintiff’s solicitors by 180 minutes and assess the reasonable costs recoverable by the plaintiff at $26,000.
V Hau & Chow, solicitors for the Plaintiff (Respondent) The Defendant (Appellant), acting in person |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 127/2014