郭卓堅 v. 林鄭月娥香港行政長官

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 803/2017 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 24 January 2018.

Case No.HCAL 803/2017[2018] HKCFI 133
Court
High Court CFI
Date24 Jan 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL803/2017

[2018] HKCFI 133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 803 of 2017


BETWEEN
  郭卓堅 Applicant
  and
  林鄭月娥香港行政長官 Putative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

consideration of the documents only;    or
consideration of the documents and oral submissions by the Applicant
or counsel [                ] in open court;

Order by the Honourable Mr Justice Chow:

Leave to apply for Judicial Review dismissed.

Observations for the Applicant:

The application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed on the ground the application is not reasonably arguable.  The Applicant’s challenge of the legality or constitutionality of the proposed co-location arrangement for the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link prior to the enactment of local legislation is premature.



Dated the 24th day of January 2018.
(Sunny Ng)
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence


Notes for the Applicant:
 
 
If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted(Order 53, rule 4A); Sent/Handed to the Applicant/
the Applicant’s solicitors on 25/01/2018

郭卓堅
The Applicant
Sent/Handed to the Putative Respondent/ the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on
25/01/2018

林鄭月娥香港行政長官
The Putative Respondent
b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and
c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).

Form CALL-1