HKSAR v. Chan Ka Chun
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 22/2017 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.
1. We grant leave to appeal on the substantial and grave injustice ground on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that the trial judge’s comments in her summing-up to the jury relying on the mistranslated portions of the applicant’s video recorded interview may have resulted in the applicant not receiving a fair trial.
Cited by 1 case
|
FAMC No. 22 of 2017 [2018] HKCFA 8 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 22 OF 2017 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 226 OF 2013) ____________________ BETWEEN
____________________
_________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N _________________________ Mr Justice Fok PJ: 1.We grant leave to appeal on the substantial and grave injustice ground on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that the trial judge’s comments in her summing-up to the jury relying on the mistranslated portions of the applicant’s video recorded interview may have resulted in the applicant not receiving a fair trial. 2.The appeal will be heard on 13 June 2018.
Mr James Tze, instructed by Au-Yeung, Chan & Ho, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Applicant Mr Eddie Sean, SADPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent |
Other judgments that cite this case