Acron International Technology Ltd v. Chan Yiu Wai and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 1709/2010 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 February 2018.
1. I agree with the judgment of Yuen JA.
Cited by 1 case
|
CAC v 32/2016 [2018] HKCA 97 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 32 OF 2016 (ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 1709 OF 2010) _______________________
_______________________
_______________________ J U D G M E N T _______________________ Hon Cheung JA: 1.I agree with the judgment of Yuen JA. Hon Yuen JA: 2.On 30 June 2017 we dismissed the defendants’ appeal from DHCJ Whitehead’s judgment in HCA1709/2010 in which the learned judge:
3.The defendants have applied for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal on the “great general or public importance” ground as well as the “or otherwise” ground in s.22(1)(b) Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance Cap.484. 4.As our judgment was the first judgment in Hong Kong discussing s.57 of the Patents Ordinance Cap.514, we give leave to appeal on the 1st Ground set out in the defendants’ notice of motion, viz:
5.We decline to grant leave on the other grounds advanced by the defendants on the “great general or public importance” ground as they are fact‑sensitive. 6.We also decline to grant leave on the “or otherwise” ground in accordance with the usual practice that this should be left for decision by the CFA. 7.The costs of this application are to be costs in the appeal to the CFA. Hon Kwan JA: 8.I agree with the judgment of Yuen JA.
Ms Rachel Lam and Ms Eva Leung, instructed by Kwok, Ng & Chan, for the Plaintiff Mr Paul Lam SC leading Ms Kay Seto, instructed by Woo, Kwan, Lee & Lo, for 1st and 2nd Defendants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1709/2010