Mi v. Ian Candy
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 21/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 28 February 2018.
1. Please note the following amendments in the Judgment dated 28 February 2018: -
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 21/2016 [2018] HKCFI 415 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 21 OF 2016 _________________________
_________________________
_______________ CORRIGENDUM _______________ 1.Please note the following amendments in the Judgment dated 28 February 2018: - 2.The Title at page 1, “DIRTECTOR OF IMMIGRATION” should read “DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION”. 3.The paragraph 97(a) at page 46, “…but not other non-delegable rights…” should read “…but not other non-derogable rights…”. 4.The paragraph 97(a) at page 46, “…apply to other absolute and non-delegable rights…” should read “…apply to other absolute and non-derogable rights…”. 5.The paragraph 97(a) at page 46, “…which were absolute and non-delegable rights…” should read “…which were absolute and non- derogable rights…”. 6.The paragraph 98 at page 50, “...Secretary for Security v Sakthevel Prabaker…” should read “…Secretary for Security v Sakthevel Prabakar…”. 7.The paragraph 100 at page 50, “…not other absolute and non-delegable rights…” should read “…not other absolute and non- derogable rights…”. 8.The paragraph 104 at page 52, “Mr Yu agreed BOR2 is non-delegable…” should read “Mr Yu agreed BOR2 is non-derogable…”. Dated the 19th day of March 2018
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 21/2016