Mi v. Ian Candy

Case No.HCAL 21/2016[2018] HKCFI 415[2018] 4 HKC 440
Court
High Court CFI
Date28 Feb 2018
Judge—
Case Document
100%

HCAL 21/2016

[2018] HKCFI 415

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 21 OF 2016

_________________________

BETWEEN
  MI Applicant
  and
  IAN CANDY Putative
Respondent
  and
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Putative
Interested Party

_________________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Marlene Ng in Court
Date of Hearing: 26 January 2017
Date of Handing Down Judgment: 28 February 2018

_______________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________

1.Please note the following amendments in the Judgment dated 28 February 2018: -

2.The Title at page 1, “DIRTECTOR OF IMMIGRATION” should read “DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION”.

3.The paragraph 97(a) at page 46, “…but not other non-delegable rights…” should read “…but not other non-derogable rights…”.

4.The paragraph 97(a) at page 46, “…apply to other absolute and non-delegable rights…” should read “…apply to other absolute and non-derogable rights…”.

5.The paragraph 97(a) at page 46, “…which were absolute and non-delegable rights…” should read “…which were absolute and non- derogable rights…”.

6.The paragraph 98 at page 50, “...Secretary for Security v Sakthevel Prabaker…” should read “…Secretary for Security v Sakthevel Prabakar…”.

7.The paragraph 100 at page 50, “…not other absolute and non-delegable rights…” should read “…not other absolute and non- derogable rights…”.

8.The paragraph 104 at page 52, “Mr Yu agreed BOR2 is non-delegable…” should read “Mr Yu agreed BOR2 is non-derogable…”.

Dated the 19th day of March 2018

  (Chasel Man)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Marlene Ng

Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 21/2016