Chun Sang Plastics Co Ltd v. Commissioner of Police and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2278/2008 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 28 March 2018.
1. I have considered the defendants’ objections to my proposed costs order.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCA 2278/2008 [2018] HKCFI 661 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 2278 OF 2008 ______________
______________ Before: Hon Seagroatt, Deputy High Court Judge in Chambers Date of Written Submissions: 27 March 2018 Date of Addendum: 28 March 2018 ________________________ A D D E N D U M ________________________ 1.I have considered the defendants’ objections to my proposed costs order. 2.As far as the amendments to the Re‑Amended Statement of Claim were concerned, these were cosmetic at best, occasioned no prejudice to the defendants, save in regard to the new allegation of recklessness (which I disallowed), and took up very little time. 3.The additional documentation from the plaintiff was inconsequential and could have been dealt with as the trial proceeded. However I had hoped that the defendants would demonstrate some judgment and gave them extra time with a view to achieving some settlement with the plaintiff. The agreed documentation and agreed facts made the plaintiff’s case virtually unanswerable. 4.However the opening for the plaintiff was not well-directed and I allowed the plaintiff’s counsel to reconstruct his opening. 5.I have concluded that I should disallow the plaintiff the costs of 1 ½ days of the trial and I make an order that there should be no order for costs in respect of that 1 ½ day period. 6.In saying that, the fault lies with the plaintiff’s lawyers not the plaintiff itself (or its directors). Accordingly the plaintiff’s lawyers must not seek to recover their costs for that wasted period from their client. 7.As to the remainder of the costs my order that the defendants pay them on an indemnity basis stands, and the order is now absolute.
Written submissions by Mr Kelvin Leung, instructed by Hau, Lau, Li & Yeung, for the plaintiff Written submissions by Mr Jonathan Kwan, instructed by the Department of Justice, for the 1st and 2nd defendants | |||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2278/2008