Peace Mark (Holdings) Ltd (in Liquidation) and Another v. Chau Cham Wong Patrick and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2371/2009 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 March 2018.
1. This specific discovery application undisputedly involves confidential information arising from the settlement of the Plaintiffs’ claim and recoveries from other parties in respect of the subject matters of these proceedings. The court has been informed that there are 3 such settlements.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 2371/2009 [2018] HKCFI 659 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 2371 OF 2009 ________________________
_______________________ Before: Hon Anthony Chan J in Chambers Date of Hearing: 20 March 2018 Date of Decision: 20 March 2018 _______________ D E C I S I O N _______________ 1.This specific discovery application undisputedly involves confidential information arising from the settlement of the Plaintiffs’ claim and recoveries from other parties in respect of the subject matters of these proceedings. The court has been informed that there are 3 such settlements. 2.Quite sensibly, the Plaintiffs have offered to provide the relevant information to the 4th, 5th, 9th to 12th Defendants (Defendants) in the form of an affidavit. 3.Mr Man for the Defendants has rightly accepted that the issue of discovery is ultimately a matter of discretion for the court. 4.Subject to expanding on what has been offered by the Plaintiffs, and with the safeguards proposed in paragraphs 21(a) to (d) of pages 131-132 of the Bundle in place, the provision of an affidavit by the Plaintiffs to provide the information sought by the Defendants is sufficient (a) to answer the Defendants’ concern over double recovery by the Plaintiffs and (b) the reliability of the information to be provided. In my view, this is a just and expedient manner to dispose of this application. 5.The affidavit to be provided by the Plaintiffs should contain the following information :
6.The affidavit is to be provided by the Plaintiffs within 7 days from today. In addition, it is only right that the 2nd and 3rd Defendants be informed of the recoveries made by the Plaintiffs from these settlements because of their interest in the same. 7.Given the absence of the 2nd and 3rd Defendants, I shall leave the matter to the Plaintiffs’ judgment in respect of the manner in which the 2nd and 3rd Defendants are to be so informed. 8.I shall hear the parties on costs.
Ms Rachel Lam, instructed by Hogan Lovells, for the 1st and 2nd Plaintiffs Mr James Man, instructed by Kennedys, for the 4th, 5th, 9th to 12th Defendants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2371/2009