Limbu Umesh v. Secretary for Security and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 234/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 June 2018.

2. Leave therefore must be refused.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 234/2016[2018] HKCFI 1311
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Jun 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL234/2016

[2018] HKCFI 1311

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

No. 234 of 2016

BETWEEN

Limbu Umesh Applicant
and
Secretary for Security 1st Putative Respondent
Director of Immigration 2nd Putative Respondent
Commissioner of Registration 3rd Putative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

    consideration of the documents and the letter of the Applicant’s solicitors dated 8 June 2018 only;       or
    consideration of the documents and oral submissions by the Applicant or counsel [                 ] in open court;

Order by the Honourable Mr Justice Au:

1.   Leave to apply for Judicial Review refused.

2.   There be no order as to costs, and the Applicant’s own costs be taxed in accordance with legal aid regulations.

Observations for the Applicant:

For the same reasons Zervos J has dismissed the judicial review application in Re Shove (HCAL 6/2014, 1 June 2018), the proposed grounds of challenge raised in this judicial review are not reasonably arguable (see also paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Form 86).

2.  Leave therefore must be refused.

Dated the 11th day of June 2018.

(Sunny Ng)
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence




Notes for the Applicant:

If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:

       

a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted(Order 53, rule 4A);

b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and

c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).

 

Sent/Handed to the Applicant/the Applicant’s solicitors on 11/06/2018

Tso Au Yim & Yeung
Solicitors for the Applicant
Ref: EL/1509301/LL(LA)

 

Sent/Handed to the Putative Respondent/
the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on 11/06/2018
 
Secretary for Security
The 1st Putative Respondent

Director of Immigration
The 2nd Putative Respondent
Ref: RNCS 6560-08

Commissioner of Registration
The 3rd Putative Respondent
Ref: RNCS 6560-08




Form CALL-1