BabelCite

Syed Sajjad Ahmed Alias Sajjad Gilani v. Security Bureau

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 260/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 July 2018.

Cited by 3 cases

Case No.HCAL 260/2018[2018] HKCFI 1669
Court
High Court CFI
Date16 Jul 2018
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL260/2018

[2018] HKCFI 1669

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 260 of 2018

BETWEEN

SYED SAJJAD AHMED alias SAJJAD GILANI Applicant
And
SECURITY BUREAU
 Putative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

    consideration of the documents only;     or
    consideration of the documents and oral submissions by the Applicant or counsel [     ] in open court;

Order by the Honourable Mr Justice Chow:

The application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed.

Observations for the Applicant:

In this application for judicial review, the Applicant seeks an order for the rescission of a deportation order dated 21 November 2017. However, the Applicant has failed to set out any ground in support of the relief sought in his Form 86 dated 20 February 2018. In his Affirmation dated 20 February 2018, the Applicant has likewise failed to set out any ground in support of the application for leave to apply for judicial review. The Affirmation merely states “Rescission of Deportation Oder Exhibit (A)”, and Exhibit (A) is a copy of a letter dated 21 November 2017 from the Security Bureau to Daly Ho & Associates informing the latter that the Applicant’s requests for rescission of a deportation order made against the Applicant were refused. On the materials before the court, no proper ground has been disclosed which can possibly justify the court granting leave to apply for judicial review, Accordingly, the application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed.

Dated the 16th day of July 2018.

(Clara Ng)
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence



Notes for the Applicant:

If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:

        

a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A);

b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and

c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).

 

Sent/Handed to the Applicant/ the Applicant’s solicitors on 16/07/2018

SYED SAJJAD AHMED alias SAJJAD GILANI
The Applicant

   Sent/Handed to the Respondent/ the Respondent’s solicitors / such interested parties as may be directed by the Court / the interested parties’ solicitors on
16/07/2018
 
SECURITY BUREAU
The Putative Respondent
Ref.: SF(D) 5583


Form CALL-1

Cited by 3 cases

Other judgments that cite this case

Syed Sajjad Ahmed Alias Sajjad Gilani v. Security Bureau
Court of Appeal21 May 2019
Syed Sajjad Ahmed Alias Sajjad Gilani v. Security Bureau
Court of Appeal16 Apr 2020
Syed Sajjad Ahmed Alias Sajjad Gilani v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
High Court CFI20 Oct 2022