Brs v. Lyy

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 130/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 July 2018.

1.  In paragraph 18, line Q, “The Child had travelled to Japan for a pleasure trip with the Australian passport” should be read as “The Child had travelled to Japan for a pleasure trip with the Hong Kong passport”.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 130/2018[2018] HKCFI 1524
Court
High Court CFI
Date04 Jul 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 130/2018

[2018] HKCFI 1524

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 130 OF 2018

____________

  IN THE MATTER of BUL (also known as BYL), female, a child born on 19 September 2009
  and
  IN THE MATTER of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 1980
  and
  IN THE MATTER of the Child Abduction and Custody Ordinance, Cap 512 and Order 121 of the Rules of the High Court, Cap 4A

____________

BETWEEN
  BRS Plaintiff
and
  LYY Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers (Not Open to the Public)

Date of Hearing: 29 June 2018

Date of Judgment: 4 July 2018

Date of Corrigendum: 17 July 2018

__________________

CORRIGENDUM

__________________


1.  In paragraph 18, line Q, “The Child had travelled to Japan for a pleasure trip with the Australian passport” should be read as “The Child had travelled to Japan for a pleasure trip with the Hong Kong passport”.

2.  In paragraph 41, line M, the sentence should be read as “She does not have the learning difficulty as in Australia, where English was the first language”.

  (Bernard Wong)
  Clerk to the Honourable Madam
Justice Au-Yeung

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Cited by 2 cases

Other judgments that cite this case

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 130/2018