HKSAR v. Zaripov Eduard

Case No.HCCC 86/2018[2018] HKCFI 1786
Court
High Court CFI
Date25 May 2018
Judge—
Case Document
100%

HCCC 86/2018

[2018] HKCFI 1786

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 86 OF 2018

-------------------

  HKSAR  
  v  
  ZARIPOV Eduard  

-------------------

Before: DHCJ Stuart-Moore
Date: 25 May 2018 at 10.14 am
Present: Miss Lily Yip, PP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Mr John Marray, instructed by B Manek & Co, assigned by DLA, for the accused
Offence: Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

-----------------------------------------------

Transcript of the Audio Recording

of the Sentence in the above Case

-----------------------------------------------

COURT:

The facts of this matter can be put very shortly. The defendant who I am told is now 39 years old, comes from Russia. He was intercepted at the airport on 6 June last year, as he came through the customs, after a flight from Rio de Janeiro.

The defendant’s possessions were searched. Eleven packets of cocaine were found in a pair of socks in his hand luggage, and a further 13 packets were found in a Dubai duty free bag that he was carrying. Further drugs were suspected to have been concealed inside his body, and in due course, a further 66 packets were recovered. Those 90 packets in all, they had a street value which was estimated to be $783,729.

The defendant at the time refused to provide any background information about himself, but it seems that he came from a fairly stable family, and as so often is the case with drugs couriers, it is almost impossible to understand the reasons why people give way to temptation, even for such a large sum of money as US$10,000.

The sentencing guidelines for a case such as this are plain. Again, Mr Marray has advised the defendant as to what these are, in a case such as this. Following R v Lau Tak Ming & Ors [1990] 2 HKLR 370, as adopted for trafficking in cocaine in AG v Pedro Nel Rojas [1994] 1 HKC 342, it would seem that the appropriate starting point in this case is 20 years’ imprisonment after a contested trial.

As this is an importation case, a further enhancement is called for, following the judgment of the Court of Appeal, in HKSAR v Chung Ping Kun [2014] 6 HKC 106. I propose to add only a year, although it could have been longer.

This makes an overall starting point of 21 years.

Mr Zaripov, would you stand, please? I propose to give you full credit for your plea of guilty. Your sentence is that you go to prison for 14 years.

Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error