HKSAR v. Shum Wai Kee
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 38/2017 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.
1. We grant leave to appeal in respect of the following question of law of great and general importance, namely:
Cited by 1 case
|
FAMC No. 38 of 2017 [2018] HKCFA 36 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 38 OF 2017 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM HCMA NO. 113 OF 2016) ______________________
______________________ Appeal Committee :Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ Date of Hearing and Determination: 8 August 2018 ________________________ DETERMINATION ________________________ Mr Justice Fok PJ: 1.We grant leave to appeal in respect of the following question of law of great and general importance, namely:
2.We also grant leave on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that, by reason of the courts below having materially misapprehended the evidence, substantial and grave injustice was done to the applicant. 3.Leave to appeal on the grounds set out in the applicant’s Notice of Motion for Leave to Appeal is otherwise refused. We are not satisfied the questions of law identified in the Notice of Motion are reasonably arguable and we also consider that the other grounds there advanced in support of the application under the substantial and grave injustice limb lack sufficient merit. 4.The appeal will be heard on 10 January 2019.
Mr Joseph Lee, instructed by Wat & Co., assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Applicant Mr Ned Lai SADPP and Mr Nicholas Wong SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent |
Other judgments that cite this case