HKSAR v. Chan Chi Ho Lincoln
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 24/2018 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.
1. We are satisfied that by reason of the refusal to allow a plea reversal in the present case, it is reasonably arguable that leave to appeal should be granted on the substantial and grave injustice basis and we grant leave to appeal accordingly.
|
FAMC No. 24 of 2018 [2018] HKCFA 37 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 24 OF 2018 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM HCMA NO. 410 OF 2017) ____________________ BETWEEN
____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ Date of Hearing and Determination: 8 August 2018 _________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N _________________________ Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ: 1.We are satisfied that by reason of the refusal to allow a plea reversal in the present case, it is reasonably arguable that leave to appeal should be granted on the substantial and grave injustice basis and we grant leave to appeal accordingly. 2.The appeal will be heard on 29 November 2018.
Mr Edward M.H. Chan, instructed by N.K. Lee & Co, for the applicant Mr Eddie Sean, SADPP and Mr Marcus Lee, SPP of the Department of Justice, for the respondent |