Read the full judgment text of DCEC 111/2015 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 15 August 2018.
1. By the present proceedings the Applicant (“A”) sued the first two respondents (“R1” and “R2”) for employees’ compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Ordinance, Cap 282 (“ECO”). Upon R2 admitting liability in the middle of the trial, the A immediately discontinued against R1. They could agree on many issues save and except who is to pay R1’s costs, and whether A is entitled to recover from R2 his costs of pursing after R1 by a Bullock or Sanderson order.
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 1 case